Friday, September 7, 2012

Citizen Kane



In Citizen Kane, Charles Foster Kane exhibits an unusual obsession with statues, which represents his desire to control and possess people and objects. He collects statues and fills his home and office with them. Because Kane’s own mother abandoned him at such crucial age, he was never able to form normal relationships with other people. He could never let anyone in and was always closed off, even in his marriages. He uses these statues to fill the void in his life. He pretends that by having all these statues, it is as if they are all his friends and family. Even his closest friend, Jed Leland, is put on the same level as the statues in the scene where Leland is alone in the office surrounded by tons of statues. It shows that Kane will not even let in his closest friend but instead wants to be able to have power over him. Kane has always strived to have control over every aspect of his life, but he often fails to control other people. For example, he first introduces Emily to the movie as a big diamond, a piece of beauty he can buy and possess. But he soon realizes he can no longer control her. So instead, Kane buys statues, which he has complete power over. He can possess these statues in a way that he can never possess friends or family. In the whole palace that he built, no people live there besides him and Susan. He does not have friends in his life so he fills his palace with meaningless things in their absence. As seen in the shot where Kane is sitting all the way across the huge room from Susan, she is miniscule compared to the massive statue that completely overshadows her, illustrating the extremity of their marital problems. Susan comments that her playing with puzzles “makes a lot more sense than collecting statues.” Which shows the distance in their relationship, as well as his inability to actually love her. The quote illustrates how Kane alienated Susan and she simple does not understand him. You can see how nonsensically he collected things in his house when they pan over all of his belongings in Xanadu. Many of the items that Kane has bought have never even been touched or unwrapped. Kane gets to the point where he begins to buy duplicates of his statues. When scanning through his belongings, they note that he has two statues of Venus, the goddess of physical beauty. This shows his desire to possess something beautiful. The final scene pans over Kane’s life collections of meaningless junk and you can see just how much stuff he has filled his house with. Yet only one item among all of the junk has any real meaning—Rosebud. Rosebud, a cheap little sled, holds more meaning to Kane than all of the other thousands of objects he collected over his lifetime. Rosebud represents his childhood innocence and naivety before he was exposed to the cruelty of the world. Kane’s sentiment towards his old sled over all his expensive goods reinforces the old cliché money cannot buy happiness. 
--Haley Gray 

4 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I found your post to be insightful and revealing on the subject of Citizen Kane’s use of statues in characterizing Charles Foster Kane. I disagree, however, that Kane literally replaces people with statues. Instead, I think that a parallel can be drawn between the way Kane treats his possessions and the way he treats the people around him. When he hires writers for his newspaper he describes himself as a kid in a candy store who has gotten his candy. They have been “collected”. Similarly, having a relationship with someone does not matter to him. Susan Alexander Kane exhibits this point very well when she says: “Love! You don't love anybody! Me or anybody else! You want to be loved - that's all you want! I'm Charles Foster Kane. Whatever you want - just name it and it's yours! Only love me! Don't expect me to love you.” His run for election was not because he cared about the issues or the people he would have represented. He only wanted to know that the people loved him. Like the statues still in crates, it does not matter that he knows or even sees them, what is important to him is that they are his. I would agree when you say that the meaninglessness of such relationships is shown by the sheer mass and of Kane’s possessions and the fact that he has never even seen the vast majority of them. Overall your post was clearly communicated and made an interesting point.

    Luke Fegenbush

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought your post was well thought out and for the most part well backed up with evidence from the film. I enjoyed your take on Kane’s obsession with the collection of his statues; your idea of what they are to him and what they represent is a take I had not considered myself. What I enjoyed most was your comment about first presenting Emily as a diamond, a beautiful object that he could use his money to get. Another line that would further your point is when Susan says, “You never gave me anything in your whole life. You just tried to buy me into giving you something.” I think this line perfectly illustrates how he is trying to buy his happiness, by buying her to love him.
    The only part I didn’t agree with was where you commented that his trouble with relationships stems from his mother “abandoning” him. I agree that this is where the problems with his relationships stem but I think you have the wrong idea about why she is sending him to New York with Mr. Thatcher. Abandoned is such strong word to use in this situation, because the whole reason she sent him away, was to protect his from his abusive father. After his father comments that he needs a “good thrashing”, she says “that’s why he is being brought up where you can’t get at him.” She is protecting him from an abusive father who can only raise him in a world of cruelty and abuse. It was ironic to see how his life changed through becoming a rich man raised by someone who could give him all the financial support he would ever need. You have to question how he might have been a different person if he had been raised with his abusive father and loving mother. The line “If I hadn’t been very rich, I might have been a really great man,” shows that this idea passed through his own mind.

    ReplyDelete