Everyone always has their own idea of how things in the
world are. In Singin’ in the Rain, we can see a perspective of how different
one’s own opinion of the world can be from the actually of what’s happening.
Though this is not new to modern day movie watchers, or those of the past who
watched this film during it’s debut, it is an often unnoticed aspect of both
film and culture.
From the beginning, we see that Hollywood executives have
created drama and story line purely to generate profit by claiming that stars
Don Lockwood and Lina Lamont create such great onscreen chemistry because of
their real life connection. They mention on more than one occasion that any
change to the stage relationship Don and Lina are rumored to have would be
detrimental to their stardom. This is paired with the notion that the newest
technology, the talking picture, is both a disgraceful thing, and it is a fad
that will go away. The audience is tricked once more when the movie “The
Dancing Cavalier” first plays into thinking that Lina has a beautiful speaking
and singing voice. From these three examples, we see how common it is to be of
a firm belief, but to be quite wrong in that belief. It doesn’t have a large
negative effect on most of the characters–Don and Kathy presumably go on to
become big stars in the talkies, the studio started the transition to movies
with sound and had a positive first outcome, and the public seems more excited
by the actual love story of Don and Kathy, since it’s real, than with the fake
one that was “forced” on them. Indeed, it is only Lina, who was generally
disliked by the rest, who was laughed out of the spotlight. This, however,
could be caused by the fact that she not only buys into the studio’s fabricated
romance between Don and herself, but also because she is an uncaring person who
seeks to destroy Kathy’s career so that hers may continue to thrive.
This movie is also an interesting piece to look at in the
context of ancestry of modern films. Though the musical has close to died out,
with fewer and fewer being released on an annual basis, there remains the
select few which still win the hearts of the masses. It is however more
interesting and relevant to see where we have come with the romantic comedy.
From film’s early beginnings, it was rather unclear the outcome it would have.
Early films were similar to plays, couldn’t rely on dialogue, and were confined
to small spaces due to the immobility of the cameras. With this film, we see
how the narrative of film has changed, even the differences of over the top
acting in “Cavaliers” compared to the more realistic approach of “Singin,’”
this movie is almost historical in it’s documentation of film, and the industry
wide transition from silent to talkie.
Ben Gross
I agree that one of the themes of this film is that illusion is a hallmark of movie making, both in front of the camera and behind. You go into great detail about the deception perpetuated on the audience regarding Lina Lamont’s performance in the “film within the film”. Perhaps you could have examined that concept in and of itself a bit further. The unspoken theme I believe you were trying to get to about talent winning out over appearance deserves further exploration.
ReplyDeleteYour analysis of the presentation of film evolution is good. There is room for more detail regarding the mise-en-scene created by the sets, costumes, and props. Gene Kelly’s use of the umbrella in the namesake scene is legendary. It is a good contrast to Dancing Cavalier’s period costumes, wigs, and props and worthy of mention. I can see where you were headed and you had great examples. As you pointed out the stylized acting of the silent era gave way to more realistic acting from the cast as the sets and cinematography became more complex.
All of your points were of value and could have been explored further. It might have also been a good idea to touch on the importance of dance within the work as it ushered in a dramatic change in how musicals were filmed. While there are not nearly musical films being made today they are an important part of film history and many of the techniques developed then are still being used today.
Jessica Davis Group 2